Skip to main content
Understanding Comparative Fault in Tennessee and Mississippi Personal Injury Cases
If you were injured in an accident and believe you may be partially at fault, you may still have the right to compensation. However, whether — and how much — you can recover depends heavily on comparative fault laws, which differ significantly between Tennessee and Mississippi.
This guide explains how comparative fault works, how it affects personal injury claims, and why understanding these rules is critical if your accident occurred in or around Memphis or Tupelo.
What Is Comparative Fault?
Comparative fault (also called comparative negligence) is a legal principle that reduces compensation based on your percentage of responsibility for an accident.
Instead of denying recovery outright because you were partially at fault, the law assigns fault percentages to all parties involved.
Simple Example
If your damages total $100,000 and you are found:
- 20% at fault → you may recover $80,000
- 40% at fault → you may recover $60,000
What happens next depends on which state’s law applies.
Tennessee’s Modified Comparative Fault Rule
Tennessee follows a modified comparative fault system, sometimes called the 50% bar rule.
Key Rule in Tennessee
You can recover compensation only if you are less than 50% at fault.
- 0–49% at fault → recovery allowed (reduced by fault percentage)
- 50% or more at fault → no recovery
Why This Matters
Even a small shift in fault determination can mean:
- A significant reduction in compensation
- Or complete loss of your claim
This is why insurance companies aggressively argue fault in Tennessee cases.
Mississippi’s Pure Comparative Fault Rule
Mississippi follows a pure comparative fault system, which is more favorable to injured victims.
Key Rule in Mississippi
You can recover compensation no matter how much fault you share, even if you are mostly responsible.
- 10% at fault → recover 90%
- 60% at fault → recover 40%
- 90% at fault → recover 10%
While recovery is still reduced, your claim is never completely barred.
How Comparative Fault Is Determined
Fault is determined using evidence such as:
- Police crash reports
- Witness statements
- Photographs and video footage
- Vehicle damage analysis
- Accident reconstruction experts
- Medical records
- Surveillance footage
- Cell phone and vehicle data
Insurance companies and defense attorneys often use these tools to shift blame onto injured victims.
Common Situations Where Fault Is Disputed
Comparative fault is frequently argued in:
Car Accidents
- Speeding allegations
- Failure to yield
- Distracted driving claims
- Sudden braking
- Lane-change disputes
Truck Accidents
- Driver fatigue vs. traffic violations
- Improper loading
- Mechanical failure arguments
Pedestrian Accidents
- Jaywalking claims
- Visibility issues
- Right-of-way disputes
Slip and Fall Cases
- “Open and obvious” hazards
- Footwear or distraction claims
- Failure to use handrails
How Comparative Fault Affects Settlement Value
Even when liability is clear, comparative fault can:
- Lower settlement offers
- Delay negotiations
- Increase litigation risk
Insurance adjusters frequently inflate fault percentages to reduce payouts.
Example
If an insurer assigns you:
- 30% fault instead of 10%
- On a $200,000 claim
That difference alone can cost you $40,000.
Comparative Fault and Insurance Tactics
Insurance companies may:
- Record statements to elicit fault admissions
- Use social media posts against you
- Argue pre-existing conditions
- Dispute medical necessity
- Push fast settlements before full injuries are known
Early legal guidance often prevents these strategies from succeeding.
Why Comparative Fault Is Especially Dangerous in Tennessee
Because Tennessee bars recovery at 50%, insurers often:
- Push fault arguments aggressively
- Refuse reasonable settlements
- Force litigation to increase pressure
Even strong cases can fail if fault is not properly challenged.
What You Should Do If Fault Is Being Alleged
If you are injured and fault is disputed:
- Avoid giving recorded statements without legal counsel
- Preserve all evidence
- Seek immediate medical treatment
- Do not accept early settlement offers
- Speak with a personal injury attorney promptly
Fault determinations often harden early in a claim.
How an Attorney Protects You From Fault Shifting
An experienced personal injury attorney:
- Investigates liability independently
- Challenges inaccurate police reports
- Works with reconstruction experts
- Controls communication with insurers
- Builds a trial-ready case
At John Michael Bailey Injury Lawyers, comparative fault cases are handled with a proactive strategy designed to minimize fault exposure and maximize recovery.
Our law firm has over 45 years’ experience representing injured clients throughout Memphis, Tennessee, Tupelo, Mississippi, and the surrounding areas.
Frequently Asked Questions On Comparative Fault
Can I recover damages if I was partially at fault?
Yes. Recovery depends on your fault percentage and which state law applies.
What if the other driver says the accident was my fault?
Fault disputes are common. Evidence — not accusations — determines outcomes.
Does fault affect medical bill payment?
Fault does not prevent you from receiving medical treatment, but it can affect final reimbursement.
